167
1
7
assesment
obtained by this means would be quite disproportionate
to the amount of general irritation which would be
caused.
On the other hand a large part of the public
expenditure in Hong Kong is properly municipal
expenditure and it therefore seems appropriate that an
increase in public revenue should to a certain extent be
met by raised assessment. Moreover an increase of
8 per cent would produce an additional $3,000,000 per
annum, and there would be the added advantage of ease
of collection.
Nevertheless the Committee consider that an
increase in the rates would be a regressive rather then
a progressive tax for the following reasons:-
(1) In the long run most of the extra burden would
fall on the tenants, since capital seeking investment in
property would still expect more or less the same net
return after deducting rates.
(2) The tenants consist partly of business enter-
prises, and the effect would be to tax disproportionately those (e.g. factories and dock companies) whose businesses
required a large area of land.
(3)
On the private occupier, assessment acts as:
bears a very approximate income tax, which, however,
more heavily in proportion to income on the poor, instead
of bearing more heavily on the higher incomes.
(4) Finally there is the danger that it would tend
گر
to encourage the slum dwellings.
In spite, therefore, of the ease and economy of
collection and the size of the yield to be expected, the
Committee conclude that an increase on certain rates should
only be regarded as a last resource, a view which the
Governor
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.